.png?time=1713590579)
JRP 2021
JRP 2021 achievements are available through
NUTRITION SECTOR DASHBOARD.
JRP 2022
JRP 2022 UN partnership
Within the JRP 2022 partnership, there are 3
UN (UNICEF, UNHCR and WFP) in 34 Rohingya
camps.
WFP supports all camps, UNHCR 14 and UNICEF
19 camps. Camp 23 was closed at the end of
November 2021.
The map below presents the location of the
UNICEF and UNHCR supporting camps.
Map 1. Distribution of UN (UNICEF and UNHCR)
partnership in the Rohingya camps.
JRP 2022 implementing partners
In the JRP 2022 implementation period there
are 5 implementing partners: CWW (Concern
Wold Wide), RI (Relief International) and
GK, SHED and SARPV (national NGO). Besides
the implementing partners, there is a
technical partner Care International
provides supportive supervision and capacity
building activities for UNICEF's partners
and camps.
Map 2 shows the location of the partnerships
and integrated nutrition facilities by
camps.
.png?time=1713590579)
Map 2. Partnerships by camps, JRP 2022 period
JRP 2022 implementing partners shift
In 2022, some INF in the camps will be
handed over to new partners. ACF and
WC/Medair are resigning the camp-based
nutrition services and other new partner
agencies such as GK and RI are stepping in
the nutrition sector's INF services.
The table below shows the changes in the INF
management in 2022 vs 2021. Only those camps
where there is a change in the partnership
in the camps shown.
.png?time=1713590579)
Table 1. Changed partnership by camp.
Nutrition sector's 'localisation' progress in
2022
The nutrition sector looks at the
'localisation' services from a different
angle. The sector's service network was
'rationalised' by the beginning of 2020.
There are 45 integrated nutrition facilities
out of existed 86 in 2018-2019 in the camps.
The nutrition sector looks at the number and
proportion of integrated nutrition
facilities under the supervision of the
national implementing partners. in 2022,
there is 62 per cent of INF managed by the
national implements partners vs 40 per cent
in 2021 (see the chart below).
.png?time=1713590579)
Chart 1. The proportion of the INF managed by
the national and international implementing
partners in 2021 and 2022.
Severe Acute Malnutrition in children under five
by camp (severely analysis)
Map 3 shows the distribution of malnutrition
(wasting SAM - severe acute malnutrition)
among children under five in the Rohingya
camps. The data in the legend shows the
prevalence of SAM in per cent (SENS 2021 and
Programme data 2020-2021). The camps in dark
red are the most vulnerable from the severe
acute malnutrition prevalence point of view.
.png?time=1713590579)
Map 3. SAM prevalence by camp
Severe Acute Malnutrition in children under five
and food insecurity (two-factor severity
analysis of severe acute malnutrition in the
camps using mathematical model)
The nutrition sector's coordination unit
analysed the different factors influencing
malnutrition. Map 4 shows the distribution
of food insecurity situation by camp (food
consumption score and dietary diversity with
the basement on SAM). The initial colour
layer is taken for SAM and covered by food
consumption score and HDDI to see the
contribution of the food insecurity on child
wasting in the camps.
The areas with the darker FCS and HDDI areas
have a higher prevalence of malnutrition.
Compare the camps in Map 3 and Map 4. We can
conclude that food insecurity is one of the
direct determinants of malnutrition (SAM in
children under five). It would be helpful to
understand the reasons for lower FCS and
HDDI in those camps.
The multi-factor analysis of malnutrition
(wasting; SAM) by camp in concordance with
health, food security and protection. The
dark green coloured camps are the most
vulnerable by multi-factor severity
analysis.
Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM) in children
under five and other contributing factors
(assumption) of SAM using multi-factor severity
analysis (mathematical model)
The nutrition sector's coordination unit
considered the following determinants of
malnutrition (SAM CU5) in the camps:
Nutrition - prevalence of SAM in
children under five as a main layer of
the map and analysis
Food security - FCS and HDDI (see Map 4)
Health - AWD (Acute Watery Disease:
diarrhoea), ARI (Acute Respiratory
Infection) and TB (Tuberculosis). It is
a normalised synchronisation of the
different variables under the Health
layer of the map.
Protection - disability prevalence by
camp as one of the determinants of
malnutrition even in smaller impact
ranges.
The findings closely correlate with the
areas of higher vulnerability from the SAM
perspective. This means that all those
factors such as food insecurity, the poor
health status of children and the higher
presence of disability influence and can
control malnutrition rates in the respective
camps. More research for understanding the
actual and strongest causalities of
malnutrition should be analysed for the
needs-based planning of all nutrition,
health, food security and protection
interventions.
Map 6. Multi-factor analysis of SAM prevalence
determinants
JRP 2022 HNO 2022 (targets) - mathematical model
The JRP 2022 targets to reach the following
Rohingya groups of population in the camps:
12,000 SAM children under five with OTP
curative nutrition services
42,000 MAM children under five with TSFP
curative nutrition services
3,000 MAM PLW nutrition curative
services (TSFP)
145,000 children under five with BSFP
nutrition preventive services
42,000 PLW with BSFP nutrition
preventive services
76,000 adolescent girls with anaemia
prevention programme (IFA distribution)
31,500 PLW with anaemia prevention
programme (IFA distribution)